HomeContact

Contact

One inbox, four kinds of message, and an honest list of the things we are not able to help with.

Last reviewed 22 July 2026

What is worth writing about

A test item you think is wrong

The most useful message we get. Name the block — abstract, verbal, numerical or spatial — and roughly where it fell, then make the case for your answer. Items that cannot survive the argument are rewritten or removed. You do not need to be right for the message to be worth sending; ambiguity is itself a defect. It helps to read how the item was meant to work first — sometimes the design answers the objection, and sometimes it confirms it.

A factual correction

Give us the page and, where you have it, the source. Test fees, edition numbers and qualifying thresholds all move, and we would rather learn it from a reader than from a search engine.

A data request

Access, deletion, or a question about what is held. Because scoring happens in your browser and nothing is asked of you, there is usually no record tied to you at all unless you have written to us. Detail is on the privacy page.

Press or partnership

Straightforward enquiries welcome. Requests to place links inside existing articles, or to have content written around a product, are declined; how the site is funded explains where that line sits. Questions about scientific review go to our reviewer’s page first, which records what was reviewed and when.

What we cannot do

Timing

We answer in English, usually within a few working days. Item disputes and factual corrections get read first because they change what other people see; everything else is handled in order.

Email

General: [email protected]
Data and privacy: [email protected]

Send a message

Your address is used to reply and for nothing else. There is no mailing list to be added to.